Understanding the Relationship Between Generative AI Dependence and Students’ Problem-Solving Ability: The Roles of Cognitive Offloading and AI Literacy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67460/ijik.1.4.2026.38Keywords:
Generative Artificial Intelligence, Genai Dependence, Cognitive Offloading, AI Literacy, Problem-Solving Ability, University StudentsAbstract
Today, Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is quickly becoming a staple of university students' work, as it can provide instant answers to information search, writing, explanation and problem solving. While GenAI can aid in learning, overreliance can lessen students' independent thinking. This study explores the ties between generative AI reliance and students' problem-solving skills, focusing on cognitive offloading as a mediation factor and AI literacy as a moderation factor. A quantitative, cross-sectional research design is suggested with a sample of 100 University students. The data will be analyzed using descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, Pearson correlation, regression, mediation and moderation analysis through SPSS. The conceptual model suggests that students' problem-solving ability may be linked to their degree of cognitive offloading, which could be further linked to their reliance on GenAI. The authors suggest AI literacy as a boundary condition that could affect the relationship between GenAI dependence and problem solving ability. New studies suggest that students' use of GenAI in problem-solving is multi-layered and constructive, as well as thoughtless, and that there are four aspects of AI literacy: knowledge, application, evaluation, and understanding of ethical issues. Thus, the present study is centered on not only students' usage of GenAI, but also how reliance on GenAI can impact their thinking processes when addressing academic challenges.
Downloads
References
Bećirović, S., Polz, E., & Tinkel, I. (2025). Exploring students’ AI literacy and its effects on their AI output quality, self-efficacy, and academic performance. Smart Learning Environments, 12, Article 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00384-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00384-3
Chen, K., Tallant, A. C., & Selig, I. (2025). Exploring generative AI literacy in higher education: Student adoption, interaction, evaluation and ethical perceptions. Information and Learning Sciences, 126(1–2), 132–148. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-10-2023-0160 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-10-2023-0160
Chen, S., & Cheung, A. C. K. (2025). Effect of generative artificial intelligence on university students learning outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100737 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100737
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., … Wright, R. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, Article 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Essel, H. B., Vlachopoulos, D., Essuman, A. B., & Amankwa, J. O. (2024). ChatGPT effects on cognitive skills of undergraduate students: Receiving instant responses from AI-based conversational large language models (LLMs). Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 100198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100198 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100198
Hou, C., Zhu, G., Sudarshan, V., Lim, F. S., & Ong, Y. K. (2025). Measuring undergraduate students’ reliance on Generative AI during problem-solving: Scale development and validation. Computers & Education, 234, Article 105329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105329 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105329
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeiffer, F., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Article 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Lintner, T. (2024). A systematic review of AI literacy scales. npj Science of Learning, 9, Article 50. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00264-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00264-4
Liu, X., Guo, B., He, W., & Hu, X. (2025). Effects of generative artificial intelligence on K-12 and higher education students’ learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 63(5), 1249–1291. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331251329185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331251329185
Park, J. (2025). A systematic literature review of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) literacy in schools. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 9, Article 100487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100487 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100487
Risko, E. F., & Gilbert, S. J. (2016). Cognitive offloading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(9), 676–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10, Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
Zhang, L., & Xu, J. (2025). The paradox of self-efficacy and technological dependence: Unraveling generative AI’s impact on university students’ task completion. The Internet and Higher Education, 65, Article 100978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100978 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100978
Zhong, B., & Liu, X. (2025). Evaluating AI literacy of secondary students: Framework and scale development. Computers & Education, 227, Article 105230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105230 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105230
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
All data are available in https://www.ijikjournal.com
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wakeel Ahmed, Afshan Qadir, Azmat Ali (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Subscribe:
All articles published in ijikjournal.com are licensed under CC BY 4.0 Creative Commons Attribution International license.
