Artificial Intelligence (AI) in making Knowledge Management (KM) more effective in Quality Management Systems.

Authors

  • Liaquat Ali Khan Saint Petersburg Electromechanical University "LETI" ETU Author
    Competing Interests

    Management

  • Nusrat Jahan Author
    Competing Interests

    Business Analyst 

  • Nusrat Akter Author
    Competing Interests

    Business Analyst 

  • Jesmin Suriya Anckon Author
    Competing Interests

    Human Resource Management

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67460/ijik.1.3.2026.28

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, knowledge management, quality management systems, ISO 9001, SECI model, machine learning.

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is the new paradigm to Knowledge Management (KM) in Quality Management Systems (QMS). This paper explores the significance of leveraging AI technologies for improving the effectiveness of KM in ISO 9001 standard quality management systems, which is a critical area of understanding for the systematic integration of AI into existing quality frameworks. Based on Nonaka and Takeuchi's SECI model, the study examines the implementation of AI technologies: Natural Language Processing (NLP), machine learning, knowledge graphs, and predictive analytics in each of the four modes of knowledge conversion: socialization, externalization, combination, and internalization. The study concludes that AI-based KM significantly outperforms traditional knowledge management by analyzing the systematic literature review in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and comparative effectiveness assessment in the six dimensions of KM, which resulted in an improvement of 117% in knowledge measurement and 97% in knowledge sharing. The results confirm that the semantic capabilities of AI are well aligned with the needs of KM processes and that knowledge graphs play a crucial role in integrating knowledge across siloed quality areas, while predictive analytics shift from quality management to proactive intelligence. Despite this, there are significant hurdles, such as the restrictions in data quality, organizational resistance, governance issues, and the "black box" effect of the machine learning algorithms, which may not align with the principles of evidence-based decision-making in the QMS. The proposed AI-SECI-QMS framework offers an integrative model for organizations to use AI to support continuous quality improvement. This research makes a theoretical contribution by building on the SECI model to include the transformative role of AI and provides practical insights for quality managers implementing AI. The results are relevant for practitioners, standard-setting organizations, and researchers, given the increase in the global AI market for quality management and the recently released standards such as ISO 22301:2022, which include AI in its new requirements for digital transformation.

69 4

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Liaquat Ali Khan, Saint Petersburg Electromechanical University "LETI" ETU

    PhD, Student, Department of Innovation Management,
    Saint Peterburg’s Electrotechnical University “LETI” ETU, Saint Peterburg, Russia
    *Corresponding author: lmahar389@gmail.com

  • Nusrat Jahan


    Department: BA in English
    University: American International University-Bangladesh
    nusratbhuiyan357@gmail.com

  • Nusrat Akter


    Department: BA in English
    American International University Bangladesh
    nusratakter4321@gmail.com

  • Jesmin Suriya Anckon

     

    Graduate School of Management, BRAC University Name, Dhaka, Bangladesh

    Js.anckon@gmail.com

References

A. Radziwon, M. Bogers. (2023). Artificial intelligence-driven management. Journal of Business Research, 154, 113312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113312

APQC (2024). Knowledge Management Metrics: Measuring KM Effectiveness in the Age of AI. American Productivity and Quality Center.

Chen, Z., Ben, M., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, L. S., & Yang, G. P. (2022). Artificial intelligence and knowledge management: A bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review. Journal of Knowledge Management, *26*(7), 1842 1869. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2021-0750

Ciancarini, P., Franco, G., Missikoff, M., Verdicchio, M., & Babur, S. (2024). An approach to integrate Artificial Intelligence in ISO 9001-based quality management systems. Quality Management Journal, *31*(2), 112-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2024.2356789

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, *14*(4), 532-550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258557

Fatora Chian, H., & Kazemi, H. (2021). Impact of Industry 4.0 on supply chain performance. Production Planning and Control, *32*(1), 56-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1784136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1712487

Glean Inc. (2024). Best Practices for Implementing AI in Knowledge Management Systems. Palo Alto, CA: Glean Inc.

Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, *18*(1), 185-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669

Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, *17*(S2), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110

Hogan, A., Blomqvist, E., Cochez, M., d'Amato, C., Melo, G., Gutierrez, C., et al. (2022). Knowledge graphs. ACM Computing Surveys, *54*(4), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1145/3447772 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3447772

ISO. (2015). ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management Systems - Requirements. International Organization for Standardization.

Lindner, A., Leyh, C., & Loos, P. (2021). Knowledge management in quality management systems - A systematic literature review. Proceedings of the European Conference on Knowledge Management, 567-575.

McKinsey and Company. (2025). The State of AI: Global Survey 2025. McKinsey Global Institute.

Mireia Artigot Golobardes, DG Just, Artigot I Golobardes, M., Grasso, G., Iamiceli, P., Maugeri, M. R., & Castro Coma, B. (2024). Artificial intelligence, Judicial Decision-Making and Fundamental Rights (By University of Pompeu Fabra, University of Trento, Italian School for the Judiciary, Dutch National School of Magistracy, Consejo General del Poder Judicial, University of Paris Saclay (Versailles St Quintin), University of Groningen, University of Coimbra, Polish Institute of Legal Studies of the Academy of Science, Bruno Kessler Foundation, & LIBRe Foundation). https://ssm-italia.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/JuLIA_handbook-Justice_final.pdf

Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195092691.001.0001

OECD. (2026). OECD Digital Education Outlook 2026: Exploring Effective Uses of Generative AI in Education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/062a7394-en.

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement. BMJ, *372*, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Pai, R.Y., Shetty, A., Shetty, A.D., et al. (2022). Integrating Artificial Intelligence for Knowledge Management Systems-Synergy among People and Technology: A Systematic Review of the Evidence. Economic Research - Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35, 7043-7065. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2058976

Popadiuk, S., & Choo, C. W. (2006). Innovation and knowledge creation. International Journal of Information Management, *26*(4), 302-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.03.011

Popadiuk, S., & Choo, C. W. (2006). Innovation and knowledge creation. International Journal of Information Management, 26(4), 302-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.03.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.03.011

Prieur P, Belloni A. (2025). Integration of ISO 30401 compliant Knowledge Management System into the process of an Integrated Management System. arXiv:2507.18201.

PwC. (2025). The PwC 2025 Responsible AI Survey: From Policy to Practice. PricewaterhouseCoopers.

PwC. (2025). PwC's 2025 Responsible AI Survey: From Policy to Practice. PricewaterhouseCoopers.

Radziwon, A., & Bogers, M. (2023). Artificial intelligence-driven management. Journal of Business Research, *154*, 113312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113312 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113312

Rogelio, J. M., & Tobias, R. R. (2024). AI Applications in Quality Management System: A Bibliometric Study. TEM Journal, *13*(3), 2146-2155.

Stefanovic, D., Stefanovic, N., & Radlovacki, V. (2023). Artificial Intelligence on Knowledge Management Systems for Business. TEM Journal, *12*(3), 1556-1565.

Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The Processes of Technological Innovation. Lexington Books.

Tortorella, G. L., Sawhney, R., Li, W., & de Castro, V. (2022). Implementation of AI in Quality Management in SMEs. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, *39*(8), 1941-1965.

Worklytics. (2025). AI Adoption Benchmarks 2025: Employee Usage Statistics. Worklytics Inc.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-29

Data Availability Statement

All  data are available in artificial intelligence, 

How to Cite

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in making Knowledge Management (KM) more effective in Quality Management Systems. (2026). International Journal of Interdisciplinary Knowledge (IJIK), 1(3), 9-19. https://doi.org/10.67460/ijik.1.3.2026.28